If NATO expansion is a defensive act, so is Russia taking ALL of Ukraine

NATO has defined its ever-expanding move into Eastern Europe as a defensive strategy, if this is the case, Russia capturing all of Ukraine should also be viewed as a defensive action by the Russian Federation. The addition of Sweden and Finland into the North American Treaty Organization leaves no doubt that the Russian border is in jeopardy, it was not so long ago that the thought of Scandinavia becoming NATO members was seen as pure unadulterated aggression towards Russia. NATO expansion has upset the delicate security balance of the Baltic and quite possibly the world. NATO has defined its expansion into Eastern Europe as a purely defensive move but if this is their rationale, it is time that Russia reclaims all of Ukraine as a legitimate defensive peace strategy to protect the Russian people. Ukraine has obviously become a Western dumping ground of weapons and other dirty dealings; it has become a state extremely hostile towards the Russian Federation.

The North Atlantic Treaty was formed by the US and European countries after World War 2 as a defensive alliance with the simple goal of deterring a Soviet Russian attack or invasion of western democracies. It sounded like a really good idea to us in the West, but a careful look at the path it has taken will show that NATO is not acting as a defensive alliance at all. Americans, Western Europeans and most world citizens are not fans of war, there are no NATO fan clubs, yet Western leaders continue to instigate conflicts around the global in the name of defensive. A simple look at how Germany, and Greece were literally bullied by NATO (USA?) into sending weapons into Ukraine, when at first, they were reluctant reveals the mob-like mentality of the North American Treaty nations. Yesterday, Bulgaria said enough is enough, they are done with weapons to Ukraine. They were done with the bullying. Bulgarian Prime Minister Kiril Petkov said

"We'll do what we have promised to do and there's no need to reignite the debate every two weeks, "We've supported the incoming refugees, we have sent all kinds of humanitarian aid, we have also been involved with repairing Ukraine's heavy weapons and we're in line with all sanctions against Russia."

"We've done enough, and we'll continue to support Ukraine," he said in response to Kyiv's plea for military aid. His response came after Ukraine has yet again asked Bulgaria for heavy weapons.

After the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, NATO has participated in several aggressive and offensive military campaigns against countries in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. The problematic word is “defensive”, NATO uses the word freely to describe almost all its actions, it is a word used for the justification of blatant aggression. What many fail to understand is that the aggressive action of NATO puts the good people of the United States and Western Europe in danger, the world is on the brink of a possible nuclear conflict and America thought it was a great idea to send long range missiles into Ukraine. Please remember that we are arming the welfare state of Ukraine in order to weaken Russia, U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin admitted this openly.

The aggression of NATO

NATO bombed a European country, Serbia, they invaded an Asian country, Afghanistan, and attacked (and obliterated a rich Middle Eastern/ African country Libya). If these actions were morally right and correct is open for debate, but where there are no debates is the fact that many thousands of civilian fatalities were the end result of these military decisions. Citizens are simply pawns in the game that many world leaders play, a bomb here, a drone there; it is all supposedly done for the good of democracy. This warped thinking resides in the minds of too many Western leaders, our bombs are good bombs, our aggression is labeled “defensive”.

NATO bombs Libya

The most serious incident occurred in the village of Majer, 160 kilometers east of Tripoli, the capital, on August 8, 2011, when NATO air strikes on two family compounds killed 34 civilians and wounded more than 30, Human Rights Watch said. Dozens of displaced people were staying in one of the compounds.

A second strike outside one of the compounds killed and wounded civilians who witnesses said were searching for victims. The infrared system used by the bomb deployed should have indicated to the pilot the presence of many people on the ground. If the pilot was unable to determine that those people were combatants, then the strike should have been canceled or diverted.

We will never know the names of these innocent victims in Libya, most Americans don’t even know the event happened. Libyan leader Qaddafi describes how the U.S and NATO literally do whatever they want. You don’t have to be a fan of Qaddafi to understand his point. Does the United States bring peace, or does it spread more war? We continue to send arms all around the globe in a failed attempt to create so-called democracies, the plan is old, tired and dangerous.

Understand the chilling video below and you will understand Ukraine, click on video and turn up volume.

What we see in the video is pure arrogance from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. We simply do whatever we want, and if it backfired, we move on to another apart of the world and create more often more conflict. Kaddafi had a brilliant plan; he was creating a universal African currency backed 100% by gold unlike fort Knox. He planned to lift African nations out of poverty and away from the West. Qaddafi was one of the richest (if not the richest) men in the world, his actual wealth surpassed Elon Musk. He said his new African currency would easily beat the U.S dollar, but in less than a year after that announcement he was suddenly gone to the delight of Ms. Clinton. You do not have to be a fan of Qaddafi or Saddam Hussein to see how America steps in and often brings more problems than solutions. After Qaddafi was removed Libya spiraled into a dangerous chaos. Barrack Obama said the greatest regret of his 8 years in office was ordering the removal of Qaddafi. Today we are funneling billions of dollars and weapons into the corrupt welfare state of Ukraine, we are arming a true madman named Zelensky. In the United Nations security council meeting yesterday, the Russian Ambassador offered proof to the counsel that the American and Nato weapons shipped into Ukraine were being sold by Ukrainians on the international black market! He showed documentation yet not one Western media reported the story. We are sending weapons all over the world and have not a clue where it will end up. American cannot solve the inner-city gun problem in Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia and so many other U.S cities yet we are arming the corrupt Ukraine. Zelensky does not deserve $40 dollars of American money, let alone $40 billion.

There are literal war zones in the United States, every day innocent Americans are gunned down in mainly in African American neighborhoods, the good people who cannot afford to move live there surrounded by perpetual violence. Crime is booming all over the United States, yet we are sending more weapons into Ukraine to fuel more death.

Look close at the wording in the picture and you will see the words of a Police Officer “it is worse than a war zone”.

Maybe America should spend $40 billion dollars and clean up the crime ridden hell hole cites in the USA. No one is safe on American streets from crime.

America is out of control; NATO is out of control and Ukraine has always been out of control. Who in their right mind would give an unhinged Zelensky long range missiles that could reach Moscow? yet our stupid American leaders do it, and Boris Johnson smiles with pleasure.

Who is holding the security balance in the world today? it is Russia, every American (and European) should be advocating for a full Russian takeover of the corrupt, dangerous, non-independent, welfare state called Ukraine.

London, New York, Paris, Copenhagen, Milan, Berlin, and all major world cities are only safe when we have a Russian controlled Eastern Europe. Everything in creation is based on balance, the West meddling in Ukraine has disrupted the delicate balance in the region.

We see an aggressive expansion of NATO rushing right up to the Russian border, we see Finland, Sweden and Ukraine openly courting NATO membership, is this not a justification for Russia to reclaim ALL of Ukraine as a defensive act? It is a fact that Russia will reclaim all of southern/eastern Ukraine, it was done as a REAL defensive move, there was a Neo-Nazi presence in the region that terrorized the good people of the Donbas. Donetsk and Luhansk will both be in Russian control in a very short time. The surrender of about 3,000 Azov nationalists means the denazification of Ukraine is nearly completed, Russia capturing almost all the south and east of Ukraine in about 3 months is a stunning accomplishment, but the capital city Kyiv is still a threat to the Russian people. The Ukrainian President Zelensky is making it clear he is going to be very aggressive with Russia, when he asked NATO to put up a no-fly zone for him in April, he wanted a direct conflict with Russia.

“Zelensky’s message is simple: ‘Close the skies or give us planes,’” Senator Ben Sasse, Republican of Nebraska, said in a statement after the meeting. “Let’s be cleareyed about our options: A no-fly zone means sending American pilots into combat against Russian jets and air defenses — in a battle between nuclear powers that could spiral out of control quickly.”

What happens when lunatic Zelensky fires off one of those long-range missiles the United States gifted him?

Let’s break it down to even simpler language, the West is funding and sending weapons to Ukraine to facilitate a long war, which would breakdown Russia, this automatically makes Ukraine an aggressive state to the Russian federation. The Russians have every legal right under international law to reclaim all of Ukraine for defensive purposes.

A Moscow controlled Ukraine makes Britain, Germany, and the United States safer, it creates a balance of power that secures NATO nations. When NATO expands, the real world risks of a Russian response becomes more of a reality, should President Vladimir Putin sit back and watch 20 years of NATO expansion and do nothing? Putin’s restraint has been remarkable seeing as he has never taken any big action in response to the NATO expansion.

If you think NATO aggression is all hype, please be aware that NATO is already doing military exercises in the Baltic

One of the biggest-ever NATO exercises in the Baltic is already in progress. The drills involve 10 countries, including Finland and Sweden, which are expected to formally join the alliance, ihe most eye-opening thing about the drills is that it was started BEFORE Russia entered Ukraine on February 24th. NATO gave the excuse that the drills were of course for defensive purposes. Looking at the chessboard it is clear Russia has already won the war, but as long as Kyiv is in the hands of Zelensky, backed by an aggressive NATO, the Russian people will be in jeopardy. We have no more Ronald Reagans, we have Boris Johnson, Justin Trudeau, and Joe Biden, and that says it all. The good people of the West had better hope Russia takes all of Ukraine in order to calm down an aggressive NATO which is funneling more weapons and chaos into Eastern Europe.